發(fā)現(xiàn)問題
某網(wǎng)友的數(shù)據(jù)庫由于壞盤了，并且存儲掉電，導(dǎo)致數(shù)據(jù)庫無法open了。單看其數(shù)據(jù)庫alert log的錯誤來看，是非常之簡單的，如下:
Fri Oct 26 10:33:53 2018
Recovery of Online Redo Log: Thread 1 Group 3 Seq 39 Reading mem 0
Mem# 0: /fs/fs/oradata/orcl/redo03.log
Block recovery stopped at EOT rba 39.77.16
Block recovery completed at rba 39.77.16, scn 0.1002048587
ORACLE Instance orcl (pid = 8) - Error 600 encountered while recovering transaction (9, 30) on object 9149.
Fri Oct 26 10:33:53 2018
Errors in file /fs/fs/oradata/admin/orcl/bdump/orcl_smon_192644.trc:
ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments: [6856], [0], [43], [], [], [], [], []
Fri Oct 26 10:33:56 2018
Errors in file /fs/fs/oradata/admin/orcl/bdump/orcl_smon_192644.trc:
ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments: [4194], [33], [36], [], [], [], [], []
Doing block recovery for file 2 block 713
Block recovery from logseq 39, block 82 to scn 1002048595
對于這種錯誤，很明顯，屏蔽回滾段即可，屏蔽之后可順利打開數(shù)據(jù)庫，不過后面很快又會crash掉，因此重建undo也就繞過這個問題了。
打開數(shù)據(jù)庫之后，再去觀察數(shù)據(jù)庫，會發(fā)現(xiàn)alert log有不少的錯誤，如下所示：
Fri Oct 26 11:01:46 2018
Errors in file /fs/fs/oradata/admin/orcl/bdump/orcl_mmon_385148.trc:
ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments: [17147], [0x110549070], [], [], [], [], [], []
Fri Oct 26 11:01:46 2018
Errors in file /fs/fs/oradata/admin/orcl/bdump/orcl_m001_373218.trc:
ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments: [kdddgb5], [196650], [0], [], [], [], [], []
ORA-600 encountered when generating server alert SMG-4120
Fri Oct 26 11:01:47 2018
Errors in file /fs/fs/oradata/admin/orcl/bdump/orcl_mmon_385148.trc:
ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments: [KGHALO4], [0x11047F6F0], [], [], [], [], [], []
ORA-600 encountered when generating server alert SMG-4121
Fri Oct 26 11:01:48 2018
Errors in file /fs/fs/oradata/admin/orcl/bdump/orcl_mmon_385148.trc:
ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments: [KGHALO4], [0x11047F6F0], [], [], [], [], [], []
ORA-600 encountered when generating server alert SMG-4121
Fri Oct 26 11:01:50 2018
Errors in file /fs/fs/oradata/admin/orcl/bdump/orcl_m001_373218.trc:
ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments: [kdddgb5], [196650], [0], [], [], [], [], []
Fri Oct 26 11:02:22 2018
Errors in file /fs/fs/oradata/admin/orcl/bdump/orcl_mmon_385148.trc:
ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments: [17114], [0x110549070], [], [], [], [], [], []
Fri Oct 26 11:02:23 2018
Errors in file /fs/fs/oradata/admin/orcl/bdump/orcl_mmon_385148.trc:
ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments: [kebm_mmon_main_1], [39], [], [], [], [], [], []
ORA-00039: error during periodic action
ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments: [17114], [0x110549070], [], [], [], [], [], []
Fri Oct 26 11:03:30 2018
Restarting dead background process MMON
除此之外，由于之外alert log有壞塊報錯，因此對system進行了dbv檢查，發(fā)現(xiàn)確實存在少量壞塊，如下：
DBVERIFY: Release 10.2.0.4.0 - Production on Fri Oct 26 10:37:20 2018
Copyright (c) 1982, 2007, Oracle. All rights reserved.
DBVERIFY - Verification starting : FILE = system01.dbf
DBV-00200: Block, DBA 4255202, already marked corrupt
Block Checking: DBA = 4258751, Block Type = KTB-managed data block
data header at 0x11022a05c
kdbchk: fsbo(596) wrong, (hsz 4178)
Page 64447 failed with check code 6129
Block Checking: DBA = 4259386, Block Type = KTB-managed data block
**** kdxcofbo = 208 != 24
---- end index block validation
Page 65082 failed with check code 6401
Block Checking: DBA = 4269609, Block Type = Unlimited data segment header
Incorrect extent count in the extent map: 16777317
Block Checking: DBA = 4269612, Block Type = KTB-managed data block
**** kdxcofbo = 224 != 216
---- end index block validation
Page 75308 failed with check code 6401
Block Checking: DBA = 4269615, Block Type = KTB-managed data block
**** actual rows locked by itl 2 = 1 != # in trans. header = 0
---- end index block validation
Page 75311 failed with check code 6401
Page 85271 is influx - most likely media corrupt
Corrupt block relative dba: 0x00414d17 (file 1, block 85271)
Fractured block found during dbv:
Data in bad block:
type: 6 format: 2 rdba: 0x00414d17
last change scn: 0x0000.3afaf495 seq: 0x1 flg: 0x04
spare1: 0x0 spare2: 0x0 spare3: 0x0
consistency value in tail: 0xfe830601
check value in block header: 0x96c6
computed block checksum: 0x3c6b
Page 85383 is influx - most likely media corrupt
Corrupt block relative dba: 0x00414d87 (file 1, block 85383)
Fractured block found during dbv:
Data in bad block:
type: 6 format: 2 rdba: 0x00414d87
last change scn: 0x0000.3b6b9d19 seq: 0x1 flg: 0x06
spare1: 0x0 spare2: 0x0 spare3: 0x0
consistency value in tail: 0x970f0601
check value in block header: 0xe825
computed block checksum: 0x3c6b
DBVERIFY - Verification complete
Total Pages Examined : 640000
Total Pages Processed (Data) : 116312
Total Pages Failing (Data) : 1
Total Pages Processed (Index): 65914
Total Pages Failing (Index): 3
Total Pages Processed (Other): 64634
Total Pages Processed (Seg) : 0
Total Pages Failing (Seg) : 0
Total Pages Empty : 393138
Total Pages Marked Corrupt : 3
Total Pages Influx : 2
Highest block SCN : 1002028510 (0.1002028510)
這部分錯誤，其實處理起來也不困難，部分是業(yè)務(wù)表的index，但是其他的幾乎都是AWR相關(guān)基表，有2個壞塊跟是system相關(guān)的基表和索引，分別是I_H_OBJ#_COL#和COM$ ，HISTGRM$。
對于業(yè)務(wù)索引，很簡單，直接drop 重建即可，對于這個sys的index，可以通過設(shè)置38003 event進行drop重建。
對于基表COM$,HISTGRM$，由于是非bootstrap$核心對象，其實也可以處理掉的。
處理方法
不過考慮到這種畢竟是存儲掉電，undo異常的情況，還是重建庫更穩(wěn)妥一些。最后補充一點，這個庫稍微有點奇葩的地方是全庫1.2TB，其中有個表的LOB自動980GB，重建數(shù)據(jù)庫是相對較慢的。對于大表，且有LOB自動，通常建議基于分片，否則會報ORA-01555錯誤的，如下是常用的一個基于rowid的分片腳本，供大家參考：
set verify off
undefine rowid_ranges
undefine segment_name
undefine owner
set head off
set pages 0
set trimspool on
select 'where rowid between ''' ||
sys.dbms_rowid.rowid_create(1, d.oid, c.fid1, c.bid1, 0) ||
''' and ''' ||
sys.dbms_rowid.rowid_create(1, d.oid, c.fid2, c.bid2, 9999) || '''' || ';'
from (select distinct b.rn,
first_value(a.fid) over(partition by b.rn order by a.fid, a.bid rows between unbounded preceding and unbounded following) fid1,
last_value(a.fid) over(partition by b.rn order by a.fid, a.bid rows between unbounded preceding and unbounded following) fid2,
first_value(decode(sign(range2 - range1),
1,
a.bid +
((b.rn - a.range1) * a.chunks1),
a.bid)) over(partition by b.rn order by a.fid, a.bid rows between unbounded preceding and unbounded following) bid1,
last_value(decode(sign(range2 - range1),
1,
a.bid +
((b.rn - a.range1 + 1) * a.chunks1) - 1,
(a.bid + a.blocks - 1))) over(partition by b.rn order by a.fid, a.bid rows between unbounded preceding and unbounded following) bid2
from (select fid,
bid,
blocks,
chunks1,
trunc((sum2 - blocks + 1 - 0.1) / chunks1) range1,
trunc((sum2 - 0.1) / chunks1) range2
from (select /*+ rule */
relative_fno fid,
block_id bid,
blocks,
sum(blocks) over() sum1,
trunc((sum(blocks) over()) / rowid_ranges) chunks1,
sum(blocks) over(order by relative_fno, block_id) sum2
from dba_extents
where segment_name = upper('segment_name')
and owner = upper('owner'))
where sum1 > rowid_ranges) a,
(select rownum - 1 rn
from dual
connect by level = rowid_ranges) b
where b.rn between a.range1 and a.range2) c,
(select max(data_object_id) oid
from dba_objects
where object_name = upper('segment_name')
and owner = upper('owner')
and data_object_id is not null) d
/
總結(jié)
以上就是這篇文章的全部內(nèi)容了，希望本文的內(nèi)容對大家的學(xué)習(xí)或者工作具有一定的參考學(xué)習(xí)價值，如果有疑問大家可以留言交流，謝謝大家對腳本之家的支持。
您可能感興趣的文章:- oracle case when 語句的用法詳解
- Oracle case函數(shù)使用介紹
- Oracle數(shù)據(jù)庫的備份與恢復(fù)
- Oracle誤刪除表數(shù)據(jù)后的數(shù)據(jù)恢復(fù)詳解
- oracle冷備份恢復(fù)和oracle異機恢復(fù)使用方法
- oracle如何恢復(fù)被覆蓋的存儲過程
- rman恢復(fù)方案和oracle異機恢復(fù)
- Oracle數(shù)據(jù)庫數(shù)據(jù)丟失恢復(fù)的幾種方法總結(jié)
- oracle drop table(表)數(shù)據(jù)恢復(fù)方法
- oracle數(shù)據(jù)庫創(chuàng)建備份與恢復(fù)腳本整理
